‘They Spit When I Walked in the Street’: The ‘New Anti-Semitism’ in France – July 28, 2018,
Remember when the mainstream would just tell the information as it was received to them unfiltered? Remember that many of my younger readers have no idea what I’m writing about. Well, in the past the reason why humanity was so optimistic about the future was that the media at the time simply gave the facts as they came. If you were a writer or part of the mainstream media and you didn’t like a topic you’d either stay away from that topic or you’d quit your job. In 2018, it’s been the underground media reporting the stories, the underground media is filling a void the mainstream media is ignoring.
The article below actually shines a light on something a lot of Europeans know has been happening for years, however, it’s not made the news because in many parts of Europe Muslims have become a protected social class. Because many Muslims in Europe have been socially sheltered by European governments, their beliefs haven’t gone through the same scrutiny as Christianity, Catholicism Judaism, Buddism, Hinduism, and Atheism has. This, for the most part, has given a large segment of the Muslim population a false sense of self-worth in the western countries in which they reside.
New York Times – ‘They Spit When I Walked in the Street’: The ‘New Anti-Semitism’ in France
I believe in individualism, I personally hate bad parenting, nothing irritates me more than a parent that intentionally spoils their children. Spoiling children or not raising Children to follow the laws in which they reside is criminal in my opinion. This is where the compatibility of cultures come into play when people immigrate to a new country. Do your religious laws class with the country you’re immigrating too? If yes, are you willing to have your religious beliefs challenged? If you answer no, you shouldn’t be able to immigrate to any western developed nation. That’s my point of view.
What’s happening in Canada, the country in which I reside is that certain religious and social groups are using the government to force everyone else to conform to their social or religious beliefs. Jews had to conform, Christians had to reform, Hindu’s, Buddhists, Atheists had to reform, why shouldn’t Islam? If Islam doesn’t want to confirm or if particular members of the Islamic faith don’t want to comply with rules, standards, or laws then they should consider remaining or returning to their native countries.
Because if this type of behavior continues tribalism is going to make a return, once this happens well the governments of the world will have a much more difficult problem to contend with. America is the last country you want tribalism war to happen in because the citizens there are still armed in many countries in Europe as well as countries like Canada and Australia where a vast majority of the citizenry is disarmed, the governments there will have to look into limiting or halting immigration if this trend of hatred amongst groups continues.
To those of you saying well they’re only Jews? Well in tribal warfare, it starts by attacking one group of people then it spreads, hate doesn’t stop and hatred is justified by its followers if one group manages to suppress another. If Islamic extremist manages to scare Jewish populations, imagine how that will translate to the preachers of hate? The main reason why Jews have many groups that hate them revolves around their above average IQ’s as a people. Groups of People with above average IQ’s can rebuild a society at a pace those with lower IQ’s can only imagine.
This of course leads to a barter discrepancy, ignore the topic of money for a second and visualize barter transactions. If the IQ of my people far exceeds the IQ of another group of people, there is little the lower IQ population can offer to me. If the lower IQ population in this sense looks at this cosmic arrangement as unfair, unjust or a form of tyranny, these lower IQ people will eventually react violently, because no matter how high a person’s IQ is they will make mistakes eventually. White supremacist as an example often makes the Jewish people a talking point of theirs. First of all, being called “white” or Aryan is recent, so the history of “white” and “Aryan” doesn’t predate that of a Jewish person.
To the best of my knowledge, there is no nation called “white land” or “Aryan land” that predates Judaism or Christianity. This obviously gives Jews a historical advantage. Being that the history of the Englishman, the Dutch or any other Anglo-Saxon differ periodically, merging this into one history and then labeling it “white history” actually contributes to their own destruction. Instead of you have family from England and Germany why not be proud of both and honor both and separate countries and cultures.
Islam as an example has different forms of Islam and because there are entities within Islam that wish to fuse all forms of Islam into one this is where the hate for their fellow man comes into play. If you read history, what you’ll notice is that consolidation often leads to destruction. Replacing consolidation with trading is what creates great nations. You’re good and this, I’m good at that, let’s make a trade, let’s barter, if you don’t want to trade with me, or if you don’t want to trade with anyone, well eventually you’re going to lose everything you have. That’s how the real world works, it’s in humanities best interests to get along and do some trading with each other.
Do some talking, don’t assume things, allow nature to take over. Nature has a way of exposing the flaws in your beliefs. If you keep doing something over and over again and expecting a different result well that’s insanity. If people would pay closer attention to the things people do instead of the things people say, this planet would be far more prosperous. The bottom line is Jews like many east Asians are simply industrious, a lot of Anglo-Saxons are simply industrious, there are other groups who simply aren’t industrious. In order for these other groups to change their behavior they have to be open to dialogue, they have to be open to debate.
Putting people in protected classes is similar to spoiling a child. If I’m a rich person should I give my child everything he/she asks for? or should I make him/her go through some struggle? Should I make my child work at a crappy job for a few years or should allow this child to sit at home and play video games? I commend the New York Times for shining a light on an issue that’s been happening for years. As humans, we can do better. Those of you with true love in your hearts let’s be better people and let’s not allow evil to reign over our planet.
Interesting times ahead.