Are Canadian attitudes towards immigration changing? If Yes, Why? – August 23, 2018

 

Below this paragraph is a short commentary piece that made it to the mainstream media website Global News. Personally, I didn’t think anything was wrong with the piece, I’m sure there were constraints on what the writer could say, but the piece did touch on a few issues that I will be expanding on in this blog post

Canada turns against immigration? That’s your border ‘crisis’

Now, the reality regarding immigration is that Canada does require immigration and the reason for this is that Europeans or old stock Canadians haven’t been honest with themselves about the system of governance they created. This, in my opinion, has little to do with politics and more to do with Canadian culture. Most old stock Canadians for the most part of abandoned the free market in search of government security and protection. These type of thinking has been embedded into our culture so much so that to explain it to most Canadians regardless of their age makes you sound in the modern day like a Trump supporter or a racist.

I will not focus on Oceanic or Western European nations that have similar problems facing their countries, however, Canadians many of whom have access to the internet have been watching the decay of Western Europe and the root cause of this decay isn’t immigration its government policy towards immigration. Come one, come all appears to be the position of Europeans to immigrants, this, of course, has resulted in the aborigines of these European nations having their freedom of speech compromised.

Having your freedom of speech and freedom of expression compromised is a depressing existence and in many respects, it’s leading to massive amounts of suicides among white males all over the world. The better question to ask then is how did this culture begin in the first place? This reliance on immigration culture began when welfare began. You have to remember that the mere concept of welfare is a very seductive appealing drug. Getting something for nothing from cradle to grave, women getting the right to vote and divorce becoming a very normal thing within society. These changes, this government actions have changed Europe.

It’s important to note that even Russia’s population has growth problems and many parts of eastern Europe where the importance of religion have been minimized. When men don’t have much to live for the chances of these men wanting to become fathers shrinks a whole lot. In Europe like in Canada and America, polygamy is frowned upon. In this modern world, women have a right to choose, it’s illegal to rape women yet women in many respects can’t share the same husband, but yet and still women can have several different baby fathers?

You’ll often read about me writing about unnecessary government regulations and this is one of them. If a woman has several children with several different baby fathers it’s more than likely that this woman will be receiving some sort of government assistance. In fact, it’s common practice in Canada that if a man and a woman make a baby that it’s in their best interests not to live together. Why? Because the government will give more money to the woman if she’s a single mom. It’s now increasingly more common to find men who are almost 40 years old still living at home with mom and dad.

So in this scenario, this unmarried couple can actually make a fortune not being together. As long as the man and woman are smart enough to argue and bicker they both can be better off financially by simply not living together. Now how does this differ from a polygamous family you ask?

Well globally being polygamous is actually an economic privilege in most cultures. In Africa as an example to have more than one wife is a sign that the man is wealthy, when there are no welfare programs or when the welfare programs are subpar women tend to flock to men with the economic means to take care of them. In a socialist country the entity with the economic means is the government, so if a woman wants a baby it’s only natural that she would find a man that’s open to her welfare scam. Most lower IQ’d young men often fall prey to this scam, have a child with a woman when they’re young and the trauma of the whole event often leads to that young man having no more children. Furthermore, that negative experience will also be bellowed to other males who will avoid having children and/or getting married like the plague.

when you restrict adults and play the role of God the way our governments have you wind up with unintended consequences. Here’s the reality, in the real world there are men who are naturally better at picking up women. Now, a woman’s choice in a mate is heavily reliant on the man’s economic means, let me preface this by saying that of course there will be women who choose men who are economically poor to raise a family, but it’s less likely this would happen in this type of society where women are more highly educated than a woman who starts a family with an economically poor man if welfare is non existent.

How the option of polygamy trumps welfare is that it forces women to be responsible for who they have children with. I also believe that abortion shouldn’t be illegal but should be an out of pocket expense for women who wish to have it. Un the event a woman’s pregnancy is a result of rape that cost should be passed onto the taxpayers in the event the woman is will to tell law enforcement who raped her. Child rape, of course, would be dealt with in a different manner.

Women have way too much power in this society, that’s the main reason why birth rates are declining. Men who simply don’t think about costs or being forced to pay child support are often the same men that could care less about welfare or the long-term success of a nation. Well, if this nation goes to hell I’ll just move to another nation. This is how a lot of people think and it’s this reason why Canadians are turning against immigration.

A lot of the people moving to Canada don’t love our culture, in fact, many of them are trying to change our culture. When all of these new Canadians become Canadians they often want to create more regulations and put more restrictions on what people can or can not say. So, not only can new ideas that challenge mainstream societies thinking not come to the surface but they’re further repressed which obviously leads to men with half a brain saying to themselves why in the hell would I want to bring a child into this world?

I’ve been calling for an economic crash and a lot of these social factors are the reason why. Canadians, for the most part, are living in a bubble, which is why our thinking hasn’t been challenged. Americans have recently experienced a crash which is why their country is more split on how to deal with their economic problems. Canada avoided the crash because of good economic policy that was rooted in interest rates being around 3%. However, the U.S economic crash and political policy in the Stephen Harpers government, as well as BoC governor Stephen Poloz, allowed our housing and credit markets to balloon out of control.

So in actuality, what the Canadian economy is in right now is a slow decline, and Canadians notice this, the regulatory framework in Canada won’t allow Canada to get out of this messy economic situation with an economic crash. Now the economic crash in Canada can happen via deflation, which is my preferred method or hyperinflation which will be the government’s preferred method. either way when this happens and Canadians either see credit markets deflate or their Canadian dollars hyperinflate the bill for these New Canadians is going to be an even greater burden as the competition for jobs will rise drastically as the government realizes it can’t pay for all welfare programs it promised.

Interesting times ahead.