Ending The Welfare State: Men are Economic abuse survivors, But only women’s Lives Matter When it comes to Canadian Courts – November 17, 2020,
One of the main reasons the government has gotten so large is because of women’s right to vote, change, and alter laws. The entire welfare state that will do to Canada what it did to Argentina will consume us all eventually. In Argentina, and many bankrupt or impoverished nations, men don’t get married, women are viewed as a liability which ultimately fractures the family unit.
So, below is apparently a story about ‘Economic abuse’ against women, but I’m sure a whole lot of men could tell the exact same story about their current wives, ex-wives, the mother of their children, and other women abusing them economically. I began this article writing about the government because women COLLECTIVELY are constantly rewarded ECONOMICALLY for abusing men.
Our entire court system in Canada revolves around women being compensated with unearned benefits collectively by men they’ve never met. There are even government initiatives that reward women or demand women to be overcompensated for less work.
In a market economy, women COLLECTIVELY require the government to steal resources from people who contribute more capital to society. This is economic abuse against men and it’s a massive problem, there are also double standards in a society, it’s actually uncomfortable to watch when a woman receives the same punishment in the court of law as a man for the exact same crime.
The article below, knowing full well the laws of land attempts to merge ‘economic abuse with violent abuse’ primarily because men are economically abused by women, it’s just that we don’t complain about it. Women tend to stretch the limits of the law, as an example, if there are sick days at a job, women are more likely to maximize those sick days than men will.
If there is some sort of welfare or government subsidy, women collectively will take more from that economic pot than men will, currently the Prime Minister of Canada is a feminist as if men and young boys aren’t being abused? Men who are Pro-union and promote other socialist initiatives you created this monster, you’re the root cause of the extension of the Welfare State and be warned you will be the main target of these people.
Men can not be made whole after being economically abused by women, in fact, if type Canadian women and welfare into Google, you’d quickly discover that without Welfare, most women couldn’t survive economically in this country. Why is that? Is it because of the patriarchy? Or does it have to do with Socialism?
Now, the collective shouldn’t be confused with the individuals, because for whatever reason, Chinese women tend to be self-sufficient, it’s not common to see Chinese Canadian women begging the government for money, now why is that? Now, when I was in school Chinese women focused on their studies, they focused on their education, and even if they ended up with an economically abusive husband many of them would leave and be on their road to economic independence.
Although the article below is written by a socialist, it’s a reminder that without men, women collectively can’t survive economically in Canada. Try to read the article below with an open mind because the writer is demanding women be compensated with unearned benefits, and those unearned benefits need to come from men and the redistribution scheme must come from the Government.
This article below is all about ENTITLEMENTS using the government to force men to pay for the lifestyles of women they’ve never met because these women are living above their means and don’t want the government to force employers to pay them an above-market rate! Now, if you think robbing Peter to pay Jane is sustainable, you need to research the history of socialismCanadian women on their own are poorest of the poor | policyalternatives.ca
It’s not to say that every single Chinese woman is self-sufficient, but they’re hard-working women, who tend to take personal responsibility for themselves economically. Now the article below writes about what could be a fictional character named ‘Sarah’ who after 30 years of economic abuse was thrown out of her house by her husband.
Well 3 years ago, I had a friend who was thrown out of his house by his now ex-wife, she took everything, he didn’t cheat or abuse her, he was actually just too nice and she simply got tired of him and he now pays for child support and alimony, is that not abuse? According to the courts it’s not and that ladies is one of the reasons why a lot of men are opting not to get married.
I write a lot about Argentina because they have Western laws and even though they have constant currency crises, the men who get economically abused by women still have to pay child support and alimony. The laws favor women in Argentina also. This is how children end up getting raised by single parents.
I point this out because the Welfare State as it relates to women was created in the event a woman was being PHYISCIALLY or violently abused. The story below doesn’t focus on violent abuse it’s focused on ECONOMIC ABUSE! This is what I like to call late-stage socialism, this is when you know your society is headed for ruin, the article below isn’t even considered extreme anymore because as a society, morality in Canada is now subjective. This is the penalty of secularism, kindness is not only weakness, Kindness is eventually replaced by ENTITLEMENT!
I know many of you have abandoned Christianity, but this is why Protestants warned people about atheism. There is no heaven for an atheist, so morality eventually becomes subjective!
Interesting times ahead!