A Candid Take on Canadian Politics, Trump, and the Direction of the Nation
Donald Trump remains a rare and unconventional political figure—bold, unapologetic, and effective at advancing his agenda. In contrast, a trend among Canadian Conservatives appears to be the adoption of what I call the “WACKO strategy”: using political speeches to educate voters instead of focusing on education during campaigns. It’s ineffective because, in today’s world, voters don’t care about what politicians say—many believe they’re liars. What truly matters is what they do.
Take Pierre Poilievre’s loss in the 2025 election. Despite leading one of the most successful campaigns in Canadian history, he lost due to what some in the Conservative camp call “vote splitting.” The NDP attracted voters who might not have supported the Liberal Party, and due to a strategic alliance with Justin Trudeau, the NDP effectively became irrelevant—channeling their base into Liberal victories. Ironically, Conservatives keep insisting “don’t split the vote,” yet that narrative keeps them in opposition.
Impact Ontarians where it counts—their wallets
Doug Ford, while not particularly popular, has managed to impact Ontarians where it counts—their wallets. He has quietly embraced an austerity agenda but avoids unnecessary public speeches that often damage credibility, unlike Poilievre. Ford’s actions, not his words, resonate more with voters.
Historically, Stephen Harper defeated Paul Martin largely because of a clear, actionable promise: to cut the GST. That move alone won him support, even though the tax was introduced by previous Conservatives. The irony is not lost here—Progressive Conservatives under Mike Harris also privatized the 407 highway, a decision I might usually support. But in Canada, where voters repeatedly reject private sector solutions, it makes little sense to impose tolls (a form of layered taxation) on infrastructure that’s already funded by taxpayers.
On a federal level, I’ve argued that Canada Post shouldn’t be privatized—not because it’s efficient, but because it’s foundational. Instead, it should be integrated more effectively into Canada’s electoral process. It’s absurd to grant a monopoly to a national service and then allow that service to operate with impunity.
Doug Ford isn’t a libertarian or anarcho-capitalist, but his pragmatic approach earns my respect. He understands political timing and public sentiment—qualities often overlooked but crucial for effective governance.
Mark Carney, on paper, may become the most authoritarian Prime Minister Canada has ever seen
Looking ahead, Mark Carney, on paper, may become the most authoritarian Prime Minister Canada has ever seen. Many who have followed his platform closely are hoping—perhaps naively—that he might turn against his own party. But hope is not a strategy. Leaders like Doug Ford and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith recognize the threat early and are already positioning themselves to push back should Carney pursue a heavy-handed agenda.
As for election integrity, I have personal concerns about potential fraud. But realistically, unless those concerns go through the courts—and they won’t—any objections will be dismissed as conspiracy theories. So instead of complaining, the better path is to act decisively and strategically.
Atheists aren’t bound by any fixed moral code—and they’re not obligated to even pretend they follow one.
Culturally, I believe Canada is drifting further from its moral foundation. Atheism is on the rise, and many of the country’s top influencers are vocal atheists. If you’re a follower of Christ, it’s clear these cultural tensions will only grow. Western civilization was built on Judeo-Christian values, not atheistic collectivism.
Culture—not race—is what determines a nation’s character. Across the globe, countries that prioritize government over God tend to suffer from corruption and instability. Atheistic nations often require authoritarian control, simply because a moral compass built on relativism can shift at will.
In closing, I urge Canadians—especially those disillusioned with the current direction—to consider returning to Christ. Without a moral anchor, I believe the nation’s decline will only accelerate.
