Before the proposed “Nation of Buffalo” can emerge as a meaningful movement, Saskatchewan must confront its internal contradictions. Based on my analysis, if Canada’s left-leaning population were to relocate en masse to the progressive Pacific States of the U.S., British Columbia would become Canada’s richest province, followed by Alberta, with Saskatchewan potentially rising to third.
The Rise of Autonomous Provinces in Canada
In this hypothetical but insightful scenario, Manitoba would suddenly gain new leverage in its relationship with Ottawa. While outright secession seems unlikely, the idea of provincial autonomy is becoming increasingly plausible.
As of today, I stand by my projection: Mark Carney, Canada’s current Prime Minister, may step down sooner than expected. Why? Because he’s accomplished, high-profile, and may soon realize that not all Canadians are as politically passive as Ottawa assumes.
Carney’s rapid ascent—winning the top job after just a one-month campaign—was, frankly, surreal. Observers could sense his disbelief even in his early days as Prime Minister. Though his personal track record is impressive, his political victory was embarrassing for Canada as a democratic nation. If he continues on this path, the public backlash will be significant.
Western Canada’s Urgent Need for Reform
Alberta appears to be moving toward serious self-determination. Saskatchewan, on the other hand, still clings to a number of entrenched socialist policies that limit its readiness for autonomy or independence.
For example, Crown corporations dominate Saskatchewan’s economy. Government-run auto insurance still exists—something even Ontario’s far-left politicians haven’t attempted. These price-control mechanisms would need to be dismantled and returned to the private sector. If that happened, Saskatchewan’s true political leanings might shift significantly.
In Alberta, the threat to leftist ideologies is existential. Urban centers remain progressive strongholds, but left-wing movements are losing steam. Many Alberta conservatives are no longer asking if independence will happen—they’re strategizing for when it does.
Saskatchewan may be inspired by Alberta’s direction, but it hasn’t yet demonstrated the political will to relinquish its generous social programs—programs that Ottawa will surely use as leverage to resist any push for true autonomy.
Autonomy vs. Independence
Make no mistake: the federal government will not willingly surrender its grip. Ottawa has many tools to destabilize or discourage an Alberta independence movement. However, autonomy is a more viable—and immediate—goal.
Take Taiwan, for example. It didn’t declare independence outright. Instead, it simply stopped listening to Beijing. The key? Timing. Taiwan made that move when China’s economy was weak.
Much like a strained marriage, a province pushing for autonomy must be strategic. If a partner (or government) is abusive, even morally questionable exits are often met with sympathy—especially if compelling evidence is presented.
As a Christian, I believe all land ultimately belongs to God, and only He can judge. But while the faithful pray for peace, we are also called to act. Civil society without divine guidance becomes vulnerable to manipulation, which is why history is filled with moments where the righteous were victimized for their passivity.
Alberta’s Advance and Saskatchewan’s Dilemma
Alberta is moving ahead: establishing a provincial police force, proposing its own pension plan, and discussing parallel institutions that would insulate it from federal control. The real test will be whether Alberta can convince its citizens—especially retirees—that a standalone pension plan is both viable and secure.
This raises an important but often misunderstood distinction: the private sector contributes to pensions, while the public sector merely pays into them. The public sector, in truth, has no money of its own. Its funding depends on taxing the private sector or printing more currency.
That’s the real reason behind the ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) movement and climate-driven agendas. Governments are broke. Without austerity, they must invent perpetual emergencies to justify unsustainable spending.
If Ottawa is deficit-spending, where exactly is the money coming from to support the Canada Pension Plan (CPP)? And how can Quebec afford its own plan if it’s dependent on equalization payments?
In reality, government pension plans are subsidized by private-sector workers—many of whom will never see full returns. Some die early, others are underpaid. Yet the costs of these plans continue to grow, especially as bloated bureaucracies and low returns eat into reserves.
Pensions as Leverage—and the Problem with ESG
Saskatchewan and Alberta both fund the CPP, which ironically limits their negotiating power. Although politically risky, creating a separate pension system could be a strategic asset—especially if it avoids ESG-linked investments that often produce poor returns.
If Alberta and Saskatchewan ever hope to govern themselves more independently, they must first control their finances. Why should Albertan retirees be forced to support risky financial experiments or national projects that do not benefit them?
This is why I remain unsure whether Alberta—or especially Saskatchewan—is truly ready for autonomy. The groundwork must be laid. The financial systems must be restructured. The political will must be tested.
Final Thoughts
The journey toward Western autonomy begins with self-discipline. Saskatchewan must streamline its economy, cut bloated services, and prepare its people for a new era. Alberta is further along the path but still faces hurdles—especially in persuading its own citizens to embrace change.
One thing is certain: the current system is unsustainable. The path forward requires courage, clarity, and a commitment to truth—not ideology.
And above all, it requires faith.
Consider making Jesus Christ your Lord and Savior today.
