Sign up for the CCF’s online course on privacy and state surveillance, taught by leading experts and zero cost! Constitutional rights. Civic responsibilities.
Bill C-2, Privacy, and the Illusion of Safety: Why Christ Alone Offers True Security
Growing Concerns and Criticisms
Canada’s Bill C-2—marketed as the Strong Borders Act—has ignited serious alarm among privacy advocates, legal scholars, and civil society organizations. The government insists the bill is about combating organized crime, fentanyl smuggling, and border insecurity. Yet the text of the legislation tells another story: one of sweeping surveillance powers, warrantless access to subscriber information, and vague definitions that could lead to unchecked abuse.
Civil liberties groups warn that these new “information demands” allow authorities to compel internet service providers and platforms to hand over data—names, addresses, identifiers, even usage history—without prior judicial oversight. Once secretive tools of targeted investigation, these mechanisms could expand into mass surveillance affecting ordinary citizens.
Even more troubling is the bill’s potential erosion of encryption protections. Provisions that obligate “reasonable assistance” to law enforcement may pressure companies to weaken their own security systems, opening the door not only to government monitoring but to malicious exploitation. Instead of enhancing safety, critics argue, the bill risks undermining the privacy and cybersecurity of all Canadians.
Legal and Constitutional Risks
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is supposed to protect citizens against unreasonable search and seizure. Bill C-2 stretches this principle to the breaking point. By lowering the legal threshold for access to personal information—from “reasonable grounds to believe” to mere “reasonable suspicion”—the bill blurs the line between legitimate investigation and fishing expeditions.
Past court rulings have affirmed that metadata, subscriber information, and online identifiers all carry a reasonable expectation of privacy. That precedent casts a shadow over C-2: many provisions may not withstand constitutional challenge. Furthermore, conflicts with existing privacy laws such as PIPEDA raise practical and legal complications for businesses forced to comply with contradictory requirements.
Internationally, Bill C-2 could put Canada at odds with human rights obligations that require proportionality, necessity, and oversight in surveillance practices. Without clear limits and transparent safeguards, this legislation risks drawing Canada into the same surveillance controversies that have plagued other nations.
The Government’s Position—and the Reality of Corruption
Officials present C-2 as a “balanced” tool to secure borders, fight crime, and modernize law enforcement powers. They promise that rights will be respected, and that privacy safeguards remain in place. But citizens have reason to doubt.
Across municipal, provincial, and federal levels, Canadians have witnessed corruption, conflicts of interest, and policy driven more by political expedience than by truth. From procurement scandals to lobbyist influence, governments repeatedly prove themselves unreliable stewards of both freedom and security. Bill C-2, with its secrecy clauses and opaque oversight, fits squarely into this pattern: legislation designed less to protect the public, and more to expand control.
Power, once granted, is rarely surrendered. Surveillance powers justified by border security today could be applied to dissenting voices tomorrow. History offers no shortage of examples where governments use extraordinary laws not to protect, but to silence, monitor, and manipulate their own people.
Why Christ Is the Only Hope
In the face of this reality, it becomes clear that no human system can offer lasting security. Laws change, governments fall, and corruption spreads like a disease through institutions meant to serve the public. The temptation to control, to monitor, and to exploit others is woven into human nature itself.
This is why Jesus Christ remains the only true hope. Unlike corrupt leaders, He is incorruptible. Unlike shifting legal systems, His Word is unchanging. And unlike governments that promise safety but deliver surveillance, Christ offers eternal freedom—freedom from sin, freedom from fear, and freedom from the false security of political power.
Bill C-2 is not just a legislative debate about privacy. It is a reminder that when people look to flawed institutions for salvation, disappointment and abuse are inevitable. The only foundation that cannot be shaken is Christ Himself, who told us plainly: “In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world” (John 16:33).