When I first heard this story, I thought it couldn’t possibly be true. Then I heard it again, and again. It was shocking enough that former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau—known for his divisive leadership—had already been punished at the polls for years of overreach and economic mismanagement. But I hadn’t realized that Mark Carney, who succeeded him, appeared to share many of the same authoritarian instincts.
At this point, it’s difficult not to conclude that Canada is on a path toward moral and economic collapse. History shows that moral decay often precedes economic destruction. A prosperous nation must respect property, sovereignty, and freedom of conscience. Once those principles erode, everything else begins to crumble.
The Issue of Sovereignty
Consider what’s happening abroad. As of this writing, Israel continues to defend itself against Hamas, which still holds Israeli hostages. Despite having the military power to completely destroy its enemy, Israel has restrained itself beyond what any nation in history has done in an effort to minimize civilian suffering in Gaza. Yet, if elections were held today, polls suggest Hamas could again win a majority government—revealing the deep divisions in the region.
Diplomacy is always the better option, but when one nation attacks another, consequences follow. This is why Mark Carney’s reported statement that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu would face arrest if he visited Canada is so astonishing. It signals not diplomacy, but confrontation.
A Radical Break from Canadian Tradition
Carney’s remarks about “supporting Palestinian statehood” and accusing Netanyahu of obstructing peace under the United Nations Charter mark a radical departure from Canada’s historic stance. Since 1947, successive governments—regardless of party—have balanced support for Israel with calls for peace.
The problem is that the United Nations itself is hardly a model of fairness. Few institutions in the Western world have been so plagued by scandal, mismanagement, and corruption.
Many of its member states openly oppose Israel’s existence. Democracy, left unchecked by moral principle, can be as flawed as tyranny; if pure democracy ruled, slavery might still exist in some regions. Sovereignty must come first.
The Danger of Isolation
America stands firmly with Israel. Canada, by contrast, risks alienating its most critical ally. A hostile stance toward Israel and the United States—while Canada runs deficits and discourages capital investment—creates a dangerous impression.
It makes Canada appear not like a neutral nation, but one that capital should avoid. The consequences could extend even further: diplomatic distrust, weakened passports, and the perception that Canada harbors sympathies for groups aligned against democratic nations.
When a leader publicly threatens to arrest a foreign head of state from a democratic ally, it projects instability. Investors and nations take note. Carney not only won the last election but came close to forming a majority government. That reality raises uncomfortable questions about where Canadians themselves now stand on matters of freedom, sovereignty, and moral clarity.
A Historical Comparison
In 2003, Prime Minister Jean Chrétien refused to join the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq without UN approval. It was a controversial decision, but it was also a diplomatic one.
Chrétien emphasized legality and restraint, not aggression. Compare that to Mark Carney’s posture—an explicit willingness to detain the elected leader of another sovereign democracy. That is not diplomacy; it is provocation.
Such an act could easily spark an international crisis. The United States would almost certainly intervene, either diplomatically or militarily, to secure Netanyahu’s release. Canada would find itself isolated, potentially in conflict with two of the world’s most battle-tested allies.
A Nation in Decline
This is why so many believe Canada has entered a period of moral and economic decline. A government that confuses moral grandstanding with diplomacy risks both its economy and its sovereignty. When leaders blur the line between justice and politics, they invite chaos.
Nations fall not only because of external threats but because of internal rot—when truth becomes relative, and when leadership mistakes arrogance for virtue. The erosion of moral clarity eventually leads to financial ruin.
As Canadians, we should reflect on what kind of country we are becoming. A nation that arrests allies, alienates partners, and undermines its own freedoms is not one that inspires confidence or respect.
In times like these, it’s worth remembering that nations, like individuals, are judged by the principles they stand for. If Canada continues down this path, it may soon find that it has neither moral authority nor economic strength left to defend.
Consider making Jesus Christ your Lord and Savior today.
