Well, Race is always a huge topic in the world, and people love to throw around the word racist to describe a person. In the real world of Freedom of speech, a tweet like the one Ron Paul tweeted out would be viewed with skepticism, an intelligent person curious about Ron Paul’s tweet might read it to see what direction or angle Ron Paul was using to get his point across. But you see that’s not the world we live in today, freedom of speech has become a subjective topic in the Western world and this is the real reason why a person like Donald Trump was hired by a large segment of American voters.
How do human beings get to the heart of a debate if they can’t express themselves freely? How does humanity move forward if one group is left behind? How do we as Humans talk about difficult social issues if particular topics have to be shoved under the rug? How can we determine cultural habits if the history of particular doctrines are not open to debate?
Was the picture Ron Paul used racist? I would say yes it was very racist, however, what’s being missed in all of this is what Ron Paul Tweeted next.
Well, this still raises the question, are there people within Ron Pauls inner circle that base their beliefs strictly on race. In the Libertarian free market would this lead us back into a racist society? For me, whenever I see racists embracing Libertarianism it’s obvious to me that they don’t understand Libertarianism and the free market. So whether the tweeter was or wasn’t Ron Paul is irrelevant to me, the truth is if you’re a racist, you’re anti-free market anyway.
In the free market, the truth is that being racist can actually be used against you and your people. Bigotry doesn’t work well with barter it can work well if you’re a warmonger which most racists are but in Libertarian form of governance Bigotry is the easy way out, it’s the Marxists way out, it’s the socialist way out, it’s the globalist way out. Libratarians leans more in the anarchy direction, now for most Leftists the idea of Anarchy is blasphemy which is why their excuse to anything resembling Anarchy is to call it racist, however, once you’ve tasted civilized anarchy you’ll hate the site or idea of big government.
What’s civilized anarchy you asked, it’s usually small town people that know how to live off the land God gave us, it’s aboriginal or tribal cultures it’s great societies before taxes and rulers, it’s tribes in Africa that have been living their own lives on their terms for centuries, until the invasions from Islamic or Christian cultures, it’s the Amish who rely on each other for their own survival it’s all of us who live our lives and detest interacting with big Government or religious people who want to tell us how we should think. That’s a part of Anarchy and humanity is closer to sympathizing Anarchist than they think.
So although I think the tweet sent by Ron Paul or his people was a racist picture, I don’t find it offensive, However, I’m sympathetic to the people who do. I just hope humanity will start to view the world as a free market of ideas and concepts where debunked concepts are dismantled by the free market, a world where warmongers are seen from afar and ostracized not by force but through debate. It’s my belief that there are humans that think they’re better than other humans.
Well, the free market has a way of disciplining elitists, this not to say that some people won’t win, but what should constitute a leader or ruler? Does humanity really want an unchallenged monarchy? If yes, should this monarchy have complete authority over us? The real debate when the issue of cultural Marxism is written about is who are the people pushing for an elite class and why are they doing this? How are elite classes formed you ask? Elite classes are formed by Governments, they’re protected by governments and they’re sponsored by the free market once government rules and regulations are enforced.
Once a government has the power to pick economic winners and loser society is getting closer and closer to Cultural Marxism. Don’t ever be under the illusion that there aren’t pros and cons to every government action. Don’t ever be under the illusion that cultures can’t be formed based on governmental policies, don’t ever be under the illusion that life can’t be better than it is right now if the Government shrunk or didn’t exist.
Don’t ever be under the illusion that free human beings wouldn’t choose to love and care for one another if they were granted freedom. Don’t ever be under the illusion barter is a form of communication and barter interactions actually raise the IQ’s of all parties involved in the bartered transaction. The problem we have in the West today is that barrier to entry into the free market is getting higher and higher every day, this is a result of government policies.
The cost of living is high because your government is picking sides, your government is choosing winners and losers and the majority of the time your government chooses winners and losers has nothing to do with the environment. The vast majority of the times the government chooses winners and losers comes from their social ideals, which is subjective, this cultural Marxism leads confusion amongst people who will interpret the new rules given to them from their government Gods as a way to run their lives.
This creates a culture and from this culture, there might be sub-cultures and subcultures from that and so on and so forth, before you know people will have traditions and these traditions will be rooted in the culture created by the Government/Monarchy/Religion. These anti-freedom cultures will by nature hate freedom and the fighters of freedom. Then eventually we get stuck reading 1100 word articles asking Ron Paul a racist? for a tweet he or his people made.
