Can I, as a Christian, go to India and lead their predominantly Hindu policing forces using my Christian morals and ethics? Would that even be fair to India, or the Hindus of India, if I tried to bully them with my ideology? In fact, I would probably feel insecure leading a group of Hindus. Why should they listen to me or have anything good to say about me? Why shouldn’t they insist on having a Hindu in charge of their national security?
That is my position on current FBI Director Kash Patel.
America is a Christian nation, and secondarily an atheist one. The Hindu caste system and belief in reincarnation align perfectly with what many of us Christians consider to be a sanctioned form of slavery within Hindu culture. I often tell my Hindu friends to consider making Jesus Christ their Lord and Savior. I do not want to be led by atheists, and I certainly don’t want to be led by a Hindu.
Dan Bongino “regular guy” not a real leader
As for Dan Bongino, he has always come across to me as a “regular guy”—not someone suited for a leadership role. In my opinion, Bongino fits better in a supportive position. The role of FBI Director is, frankly, over his head.
Is this an attack on the Trump administration? Absolutely. Trump has hired unqualified people before. In the private sector, you can simply say, “You’re fired.” In the public sector, things are different. Trump has a habit of hiring people well-known to the press for certain positions, likely for optics. For many of us Christians, when Trump hired Kash Patel, we questioned how he could claim to be Christian yet make such a poor decision. I’m not a fan of Tulsi Gabbard as Intel Chief either.
Tulsi Gabbard converted to Hinduism
Tulsi Gabbard, a Hawaiian who converted to Hinduism, did what many Democrats do—convert or adopt new identities to appear “woke.” From my perspective, I do not care if Hindus serve one god or many gods. They have a different code of ethics and morality.
That’s fine—but I want to see Hindus demonstrate what their gods can do in their own country. We already know the power of our God. I don’t think it’s fair to put Kash Patel in this position because, for me, any national curse can be attributed to the leadership above us—and he does not deserve that burden.
This is why I disagree with Trump placing him in this role.
When Joe Biden began appointing trans-identifying individuals to military leadership roles, of course military recruitment dropped. From a Christian point of view, transgender individuals face mental health challenges.
This does not mean they aren’t deserving of God’s love, but it does mean they should not be elevated into positions of command. If you are not Christian or don’t believe in Christ as King, you end up making the same mistakes Trump and Biden have made—putting people who reject Biblical authority into leadership roles. You cannot blame such leaders for implementing what they believe to be right.
FBI Director Kash Patel Faces Harsh Criticism
FBI Director Kash Patel received an unflattering evaluation in a report compiled by both current and retired agents. The report examined Patel’s leadership during his first six months in the role.
The document—described as a “pulse check”—was leaked to the New York Post and later circulated through additional outlets. According to journalists, the report will be delivered to the ranking members of the House and Senate Judiciary Committees.
The findings were deemed “discouraging,” stating that the FBI under Patel is “chronically under-performing.”
The report follows rumors that Patel may soon be removed from his post. The White House has denied these reports.
Agents Express Fear and Doubt About Patel’s Leadership
The report contains testimony from agents describing the FBI as “paralyzed by fear.” Several individuals said they are afraid to speak openly due to fears of retaliation or termination.
Others questioned Patel’s qualifications:
- One agent said Patel “lacks the requisite knowledge and deep understanding” needed for the directorship.
- Another described him as “insecure.”
- Some questioned whether Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino could “deal effectively with top-tier threats.”
Both men were also criticized for excessive use of social media and focusing too heavily on public relations.
Reported Incidents Under Patel’s Leadership
Several incidents were highlighted:
- The Firearm Discussion and Polygraph Tests
An agent identified as ALPHA 95 recounted Patel ordering staff to take polygraph tests after learning they discussed whether he should receive an FBI firearm—an action the agent called “punitive.”
- The Utah Raid Jacket Incident
Another incident involved Patel’s refusal to disembark from an aircraft in Utah unless he wore an FBI raid jacket that perfectly matched his requirements. Agents had to pause an active case to locate patches for a borrowed jacket.
I’m skeptical about this complaint, because during a RAID people absolutely have the right to know that it is the federal government taking control of their property. Patel, being a visible minority, may have felt insecure depending on the area he was entering, especially considering how skin color can influence public perception.
However, if an FBI patch was already present, one could argue that it shouldn’t matter. Many visible minorities serve in the FBI and are expected to be strong enough to handle the harsh realities of the job, similar to Black Christian Americans, who have had to confront blatant racism while still upholding their duties. If the law is the law until it is changed, then you cannot compromise the integrity of a raid because of personal insecurity.
Some Positive Feedback
Not all responses were negative.
Some agents described Patel as:
- “Personable and likable”
- Someone who pushed necessary reforms
- A leader who re-focused the bureau on casework and direct threats
Still, according to report authors, feedback skewed 80/20 negative.
Bongino Responds
Dan Bongino commented on the backlash, stating that detractors are upset about reforms and attempting to revert to the “old ways” of the FBI.
He encouraged critics to “judge the results,” insisting that he and Patel work for the American people—not for headlines.
Final Thoughts
America is at a crossroads. We must decide whether leadership should reflect our Christian heritage or drift toward ideologies foreign to our foundational values. I do not wish harm on Kash Patel—far from it. I simply believe he should not bear the pressure of leading a Christian nation’s domestic intelligence apparatus when his worldview and upbringing differ fundamentally from the nation he commands.
Consider making Jesus Christ your Lord and Savior today.
