According to Netflix, Terence “Bud” Crawford’s historic victory over Saul “Canelo” Alvarez for the undisputed super-middleweight title garnered an impressive 41.4 million global viewers. However, just a year earlier, Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson shattered records, becoming the most-watched boxing event in streaming history with over 108 million live viewers worldwide.
While this may sound like a win for boxing, the comparison reveals a significant challenge for promoters Dana White and Turki Al-Sheikh, who have invested heavily in repositioning boxing’s global appeal through mega-fights and superstar signings.
Why Crawford’s Win Still Falls Flat (Optically)
From a boxing purist’s perspective, Terence Crawford’s performance was masterful. He outclassed a former pound-for-pound king in Canelo Alvarez, securing undisputed status across multiple divisions. But from a marketing and storytelling standpoint, Crawford’s dominance didn’t translate into narrative magic — and in professional boxing today, the narrative often matters more than the win.
Key Issues with Crawford’s Branding:
- Lack of vulnerability: Crawford is almost too dominant. Unlike legends such as Mike Tyson or Canelo Alverez, there’s no “David vs. Goliath” story in his career. He rarely appears challenged, which makes his victories less relatable or dramatic.
- Perception of physical advantage: Casual fans viewing the Canelo fight might question why Crawford was ever the underdog. He appeared longer, leaner, and faster — and ultimately dismantled a seemingly smaller opponent.
- Failure to capture public imagination: Unlike Mayweather, who leaned into the “villain” persona, or Jake Paul, who successfully transitioned from Disney fame to prizefighting underdog, Crawford has struggled to define a compelling public identity.
Why Jake Paul and Mike Tyson Stole the Show
In contrast, Jake Paul vs. Mike Tyson offered a ready-made blockbuster narrative. Tyson, once the most feared man in boxing, faced a young YouTube personality-turned-fighter — and audiences were emotionally invested.
Why Paul vs. Tyson Worked:
- Clear emotional stakes
- Massive promotional push
- A crossover audience (boxing + entertainment)
- Both fighters bring personal brands that resonate globally
The result? 108 million live viewers — a staggering figure that sets a new standard in streaming sports events and positions Jake Paul as arguably the most bankable figure in boxing today.
Implications for Dana White and Turki Al-Sheikh
White and Al-Sheikh have taken bold steps to centralize and commercialize boxing, possibly attempting to mimic the UFC’s one-brand, one-belt model. But this recent matchup revealed the limits of throwing money at traditional stars.
While they inked Canelo Alvarez to a lucrative multi-fight deal — reportedly to set up a fight with Jake Paul — the timing backfired. Instead of Canelo entering that fight on a high, he was dominated by Crawford, weakening the public’s desire to see him in another mega-fight, especially one with Jake Paul, who now holds all the negotiating leverage.
It’s also worth noting that the viewer breakdown suggests that at least 75% of the 41.4 million tuned in primarily for Canelo, not Crawford — a tough pill to swallow for investors hoping to position Crawford as the next global boxing icon.
What’s Next for Terence Crawford?
Crawford’s legacy as an all-time great is secure from a boxing standpoint. However, to transcend the sport in today’s media landscape, he may need to take on challenges that elevate the storyline, not just the resume.
A potential matchup with David Benavidez, who is younger, larger, and undefeated, could offer the kind of “David vs. Goliath” narrative Crawford has been missing.
This may be the last best chance for White and Al-Sheikh to build market momentum around Crawford before fan interest plateaus.
Lessons from Mike Tyson and Floyd Mayweather
In boxing, winning doesn’t always define your brand. Mike Tyson, despite losing high-profile fights to Evander Holyfield and Lennox Lewis, remains one of the sport’s most profitable and recognizable names. Why? Because he was larger than the belt — he embodied the spirit of the sport.
Floyd Mayweather, in contrast, built his empire around invincibility, wealth, and controversy. Whether you watched to see him win or lose, you watched — and that’s what counted.
Final Thoughts
The sport of boxing continues to evolve. The business of boxing, however, remains dictated by perception, storytelling, and emotional stakes. Dana White and Turki Al-Sheikh now face the reality that star power and viewership don’t always align with merit or skill.
Unless Crawford can develop a narrative arc that captures imagination — or unless he faces a foe who forces him into visible adversity — he may never become the box office draw his talent deserves.
Meanwhile, Jake Paul continues to master the art of perception, proving that the future of boxing may look very different from its past.
Consider making Jesus Christ your Lord and Savior today.