A Buzzword Wrapped in Bureaucracy
For starters, ESG has its own page on the Canadian governments website type “The Canada Energy Regulator and ESG – Overview of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG)” into Google to learn more.
Nobody knows exactly what Prime Minister Mark Carney means when he uses the term “Decarbonized Oil.” For many of us paying attention, the phrase first emerged within the language of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing—sometimes called Net Zero. But I call it what it really is: a corporate welfare framework built on the back of public pensions.
If you rely on a pension, this topic might anger you. Because the uncomfortable truth is that pensions around the world are already in trouble—not just on paper, but in real-world vulnerability. With algorithmic trading bots and weak oversight, financial markets can collapse overnight, unless governments intervene. That’s where ESG comes in.
ESG: The Globalist Safety Net for Fragile Markets
In past articles, I’ve written about the “Plunge Protection Team,” a U.S. government-backed group formed in 1988 to stabilize markets during crisis. ESG is, in many ways, the corporate version of that safety net—but with a political twist. It’s a system designed to score political points and maintain investor confidence while shielding institutions from backlash.
Trump’s policies have shaken the ESG ecosystem, but they haven’t destroyed it—yet. Companies like Brookfield Asset Management, closely tied to Mark Carney, remain largely untouched. That’s because the policies undermining ESG are not yet law, and ESG-linked investments are still deeply rooted in global regulatory frameworks.
Why Carney Is Looking to Europe While the U.S. Pulls Back
While the U.S. moves to scale back ESG’s influence, Europe is doubling down. On paper, the European Union appears more prepared than the U.S. to dictate global environmental policy. But Trump’s tariff threats are flipping the script—undermining Europe’s leverage by making U.S. markets more attractive and less reliant on global consensus.
Mark Carney, however, seems to be aligning Canada with Europe, not the U.S.—a questionable move when the American economy is clearly the only serious global engine at the moment. His rhetoric and regulatory ambitions mirror European-style bureaucracy, with all the usual talking points: carbon capture, decarbonized oil, and energy transition wrapped in ESG lingo.
Decarbonized Oil: A Fancy Label for an Expensive System
So what is Decarbonized Oil? It’s tied to concepts like carbon credits, carbon capture, and emissions trading—all of which fall under the ESG umbrella. The idea is simple: polluters can continue operating, but they must pay ESG-aligned entities to “clean up” their emissions. In return, they receive carbon credits, which governments reward through tax breaks or regulatory leniency.
This system doesn’t reduce pollution—it monetizes it. And companies like Brookfield profit handsomely from it. The ESG industrial complex creates a world where compliance becomes currency, and the corporations that master the system win—even as taxpayers and pensioners foot the bill.
Selling ESG to the Far-Left
What’s most troubling is how successful ESG has been at branding itself as morally virtuous. To many on the far-left, ESG sounds like a dream: corporations “fighting climate change” while simultaneously funding welfare programs. It’s the perfect sales pitch for voters who believe the private sector can—and should—be forced to subsidize social outcomes.
But this messaging only works because conservatives often fail to confront it head-on. Many right-leaning individuals exist in ideological echo chambers, assuming logic will eventually prevail. It won’t—not when ESG is built on emotion, fear, and utopianism.
Atheism, Natural Law, and the Absence of Consequence
Here’s another layer often missed: a growing number of conservatives are atheists, which fundamentally shifts the moral language used in these debates. Without a Judeo-Christian foundation, many atheists argue from utilitarianism or so-called “natural law”—frameworks that lack the eternal consequence Christianity offers.
That absence of spiritual accountability allows the most radical activists to believe they can reshape the world however they want, without concern for the soul or the social cost. And that’s dangerous, because when belief is optional, morality becomes negotiable.
Wildfires and the Consequence of Stagnation
When wildfires rage across Canada, many immediately blame climate change. But I see something else: a country that no longer rewards development. When economic incentives dry up, fewer people take responsibility for the land. Fewer eyes, fewer hands, and more destruction.
Even if some wildfires are started by people, the lack of meaningful economic development means less motivation to prevent disaster. When land holds no value, neglect becomes the norm. This is the side of environmental decay ESG ignores.
Brookfield, ESG, and Mark Carney’s Interests
When Mark Carney talks about Decarbonized Oil, pay attention—but don’t be surprised if it doesn’t make sense. That’s by design. Because the benefits of ESG—and everything tied to decarbonized oil—primarily benefit institutions like Brookfield, where Carney has deep ties.
Whether you call it ESG, Net Zero, or Decarbonized Oil, the core principle is the same: use government regulation to generate profit under the guise of sustainability. And if you’re relying on a pension, that money is already on the line.
Consider Making Jesus Christ Your Lord and Savior Today,
please stop thinking Politicians or content creators will save you.
Come home to Christ!