What Is a Schedule One Bank in Canada?
A Schedule One bank in Canada is a wholly Canadian-owned, widely held domestic bank. These institutions are not controlled by foreign entities, are required to accept deposits from the public, and operate under Canada’s Bank Act. Major examples include RBC, TD, and CIBC. Because of their size and regulatory exposure, these banks operate under some of the strictest compliance and reputational risk frameworks in the country.
Why Canadian Banks Are Becoming Hostile to Crypto Users
If you are wondering why Schedule One banks in Canada are becoming hostile, or increasingly hostile, toward cryptocurrency users, the reason is not ideological. It is risk management.
Canada has experienced a documented rise in antisemitic and radical Islamist activity over the past several years. This trend accelerated under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and continues under Prime Minister Mark Carney, who has made no meaningful changes to Canada’s catch-and-release enforcement framework.
For large Canadian banks, reputational risk matters more than retail account volume. When terrorism investigations intersect with digital assets, banks respond by cutting exposure. Crypto users are simply collateral damage.
The Toronto Terrorism Case That Changed the Risk Equation

A recent terrorism investigation in the Greater Toronto Area made this risk impossible to ignore.
Toronto police arrested a 26-year-old man, Waleed Khan, on terrorism-related charges. He is accused of providing funds and property to ISIS, aiding terrorist activity, and conspiring to commit murder on behalf of a terrorist group. Authorities allege the offences occurred between June and August of this year.
Khan and two other men, Osman Azizov, 18, and Fahad Sadaat, 19, were also charged in connection with two attempted kidnappings targeting women in Toronto and Mississauga. Police stated the crimes were motivated by hate-based extremism and included targeting members of the Jewish community.
During searches of the accused individuals’ residences, police allegedly recovered firearms, ammunition, and evidence linking the activity to national security threats. The investigation was later transferred to the RCMP.
Authorities confirmed that cryptocurrency, including Bitcoin, was allegedly used to facilitate funding within this network.
Why Banks Respond by Cutting Off Crypto Accounts
From a Schedule One bank’s perspective, this creates a simple equation.
Large banks already generate more profit than they can deploy efficiently. They do not need high-risk retail clients. Crypto traders who generate minimal fee revenue but create compliance exposure are not worth the risk.
Smaller financial institutions may accept that exposure. Schedule One banks do not.
When terrorism investigations involve cryptocurrency, banks react by over-correcting. Account closures, enhanced monitoring, and silent de-risking become standard practice. This is not about everyday crypto users being criminals. It is about banks refusing to explain nuance to regulators, media, or shareholders.
Political Signaling and Its Downstream Effects
Public political statements matter.
When Canadian leadership publicly signals hostility toward Israel during an active war, including statements suggesting the arrest of Israel’s prime minister, it emboldens extremist narratives domestically. That signaling does not remain abstract. It shows up in law enforcement files, intelligence briefings, and compliance reports.
Once extremist financing touches crypto rails, banks respond predictably.
Crypto does not cause terrorism. But it becomes associated with it in compliance modeling. That distinction is irrelevant to a bank whose priority is preserving its license and reputation.
What This Means for Canadian Crypto Traders
If you trade cryptocurrency in Canada and bank with a Schedule One institution, you should not be surprised if your account is frozen, restricted, or terminated without warning.
Banks are not required to keep you as a customer. They are for-profit institutions operating under intense regulatory pressure. If your activity creates more risk than revenue, the relationship ends.
Many Canadians have already experienced account closures while holding active crypto accounts. This trend will accelerate, not reverse.
Final Thoughts
Canada’s political, regulatory, and security environment has shifted. Schedule One banks are adapting accordingly. Crypto traders who ignore that reality do so at their own risk.
Consider diversifying your banking relationships accordingly.
Consider making Jesus Christ your Lord and Savior today.