Canadian Mainstream Media Has Justin Trudeau’s Back, The Andrew Scheer Attack Ads Begin – October 2, 2019,
Just being honest I thought the article you can read below written by Teresa Wright of The Canadian Press. In the article, she justifies repeatedly why foreign countries are entitled to Canadian taxpayer dollars😂. I was trying to find the “Baloney” in which she was referring too, but her entire article revolved around justifying why Canadians taxpayers many of whom are either in debt or can’t make a down payment on a house should send their money to Argentina, Barbados, Brazil, China, Iran, Italy, Mexico, and Turkey? She even refers to multinational agreements as her basis for why the government should be allowed to take our money and give it to whomever they feel like.
I personally give to about 5 charities annually(usually on a monthly basis) that I believe in and the reality is if Canadians had more money in their pockets they’d probably do the same. Now, being that I’ve gotten involved in charities abroad, one of the main problems you learn very quickly is that poverty starts from the Government. With the exception of Barbados which I don’t think is very poor Argentina, Brazil, China, Iran, Italy, Mexico, and Turkey all have a socialism problem. Those countries aren’t poor at all, the truth is no country on this planet is poor, the problem these countries have are corrupt governments who use socialism as their means not to allow Capitalist to fix the countries problems.
You need a private sector to finance the public sector and what most of these so-called poor countries do is they grow their public sectors so big and create so many regulations that investment which would otherwise help their countries development never comes, this is why these countries get aid and it should be stopped because Canada is in many ways propping up regimes that would be toppled by the people if the people knew there was a better option.
Anyway, what I wrote above won’t change a Liberal voters mind, they’re fixated on their own greed which they wrap in virtue for not having the ability or the will power to start a business or charity so they can learn first hand the common ideology (Marxism, socialism) which most corrupt governments use as their basis to strip people of their freedoms, private property, and their productive capacities. If you want to know why Africa is poor start a business or a charity go to the country and learn how strong the Government regulations are in those poor countries.
From my standpoint, the articles I point to below are geared towards changing the minds of the swing voters. The vagueness, the lack of explantation they blandness is in many ways disgusting. I love to read as do many young people and I fear for their futures when I read this nonsense.
Now, another hilarious Leftist article was written by Heather Mallick, in which she goes on the attack for Andrew Scheers resume as an insurance agent. Read this snippet
The news that Conservative Party Leader Andrew Scheer was not and never has been an insurance broker has left Canadians, well, broken. If Prime Minister Justin Trudeau had made a similar admission, we would have been equally in pieces.😂😂😂
Heather Mallick: Why Andrew Scheer is coy about his thin resume | Thestar.com
Why the comparison?😂 Prime Minister Blackface by his own admission comes from a privileged background, he was a DRAMA teacher, Trudeau has a gender-balanced cabinet, which equates to Trudeau not even hiring the Liberals best and brightest, he simply put people into positions of power to make a political statement. So, to put Trudeau next to Scheer, not a good idea, it’s important to remember how big of a family Andrew Scheer has, as far as I know, he’s not a dead beat dad? So again in regards to Heather Mallick, her article should say that her Advertorial was brought to you by the Liberal Party of Canada😂😂😂. @ thestar.com do better. Clearly what Scheer did in his prior life isn’t that important, because if it were I doubt Canadians would have made a French, humanities, and drama teacher Prime Minister. As a teacher, Trudeau’s judgment can be seen on full display in the video above, do better @thestar.com do better!
Then there’s Michael Coren of thestar.com read this snippet below
But here’s the thing. As much as I am revolted by what Trudeau did with his blackface nonsense, I’m more concerned at the Conservatives’ whiteface antics. That party’s approach to climate change policy, First Nations issues, economic justice, foreign affairs, social equality, and so much else is deeply disquieting. 😂
Michael Coren: Why Andrew Scheer would be a dangerous prime minister | Thestar.com
Anther Liberal Party advertorial, now one thing I’ll give Michael Coren credit for is that at the very least he added some creativity to his article. Where Heather Mallick didn’t even try to add substance or value to her article, Michael Coren did. I learned that Michael Coren spent the first half of his life in Britain and he even used the words “economic chaos” and ” global economic recession” in his article which interests me because most of the intelligent people on the Left can comprehend the relationship between social justice and economics.
Where you can see the laziness in his article is when you realize that he’s come to the same conclusion many of us have come too, which is a minority government for Trudeau. The radical Left in Canada primarily resides in The Green Party, however Jagmet Singh and the NDP have to find a way to stand out and if all they do is agree with everything Trudeau says and does, they’ll lose their grip on power.
Elizabeth May has her worked cut out for her and her followers are passionate about the environment, Trudeau has a Western Canada problem, that will explode if he stagnates pipeline development. As I’ve stated in other posts, the Alberta separation movement will grow if Trudeau wins a second term and if one can imagine a House of Commons of Canada with The NDP, and the Greens all with enough votes to compromise the Liberal agenda, you’ll start to see how Trudeau will find himself boxed in.
This is of course how the political Right will more than likely dominate the 2023 election. If Trump wins a second term, Brexit happens and the 2023 Canadian election is dominated by the Conservatives and The People’s Party of Canada, Leftism in Canada might be left dormant for the next decade. In Britain, it’s important to remember that their Liberal Party known as the Labour Party is looked at almost comically by even moderate voters. Brexit exists because their Conservative Party is split.
In the United States, the Democrat Party is such a joke that Donald Trump won the election. Leftism as merged with the Globalist and they’re playing a very dangerous game which threatens to make them obsolete in years to come.
It’s always important to remember that prior to the classical Liberals dissolving into tax and spend Liberals, they were the people who fought to separate church and state. Well, in the interests of Leftist greed, the modern-day Left now wants to replace the church with the State. A lot of proposals made by the Leftists want to limit your freedom of speech, they want to control what you way and how you say it. Jordan Petterson as an example isn’t a Conservative, he’s a Liberal, but he’s classical Liberal that believes in freedom of speech and debating your opponents out of existence. So, when the Liberal government tried to put laws on the books which would force people to speak in politically correct terms, the Classical Liberal that resided within Jordan Petterson reacted.
The modern-day Liberals, the modern-day Leftists, want to replace the church with the State and they want the government to pick social and economic winners and losers. This is of course, why Conservatism and populism have grown larger. Now, when you take the Heather Mallick approach, which is I will be an advertorial for Justin Trudeau no matter what he says or does, this creates division because we have to debate the issues.
I lean to the Political Right, but that doesn’t mean that the Left doesn’t add value to discussions, my problem is the Liberal value to make Canada a better place is disintegrating, they’ve become radical, read some Heather Mallick posts and you’ll see the reason why Liberals are no longer nice people.
I’m not even a Scheer supporter, I’m not voting for Scheer, but why the comparison to Trudeau? Why justify Trudeau’s actions? I hope Liberal supporters understand that Prime Minister Blackface is going to be the face of Canada on the global stage. Personally, if Trudeau wins I’ll be very embarrassed for my country.
If Scheer wins, I won’t be happy either, both candidates make me cringe, however to my knowledge Scheer won’t go around the world virtue signaling. Trudeau doesn’t have any substance to him, his drama teacher talents have definitely been on full display on the world stage, but because Trudeau’s weakness resides in economics, he’s usually the dumbest G7 leader on the international stage and because of his multiple Blackface incidents it will be embarrassing to watch and to listen him make any speech on an international platform as the representative of our country.
What value can he add? Anyway, the mere thought of Trudeau winning makes me want to throw up, the only brightside to a Trudeau victory is hopefully Canadians will realize what’s happened to us. Sometimes things have to get worse before they get better and both Trudeau and Scheer are clear signs that the Canadian economy is headed for some serious challenges ahead.
Canada’s mainstream media, do better please, if you’re going to write advertorials, just tell your readers you’re writing an advertorial, there’s nothing wrong with Heather Mallick or Michael Coren writing an advertorial, but stop with this buffoonery, young people are reading your garbage and they’re becoming radicalized because you’re only providing one solution and these kids are assuming that the other side is evil. If you can’t debate the real issues, without hurling racial slurs at your opponents, it’s a sign that there are obvious flaws in your arguments and your political causes.
As I’ve stated in many articles you claim automation is taking jobs away why is there welfare and a minimum wage? If jobs are leaving wouldn’t it be wise to get rid of minimum wages so we can at least find where the poverty line starts? So in the event people who are working but who aren’t making enough can receive assistance. Instead, it’s actually more beneficial in many respects for a person to be on welfare than it is for them to work a lower-paying job.
Also, there are a lot of so-called poor people who turn down jobs and why shouldn’t they if the government keeps raising the barrier to entry in the job market? If able-bodied people in Canada don’t want to work, that’s fine, but Canadians who do work and are willing to do lower wage-paying jobs shouldn’t be subsiding people who don’t work at all. We don’t even talk about this anymore, Personally I think people have the right, not to work, but if opt not to contribute to the development of society, why are you allowed to force those of us who do work to subsidize your lifestyle, that’s slavery and it needs to be called out.
Most manufacturing businesses in Canada have left because doing business in Canada is too expensive. The government made doing business in Canada expensive, government wage controls and price-fixing also make building a SMALL business in Canada extremely expensive, CMHC and the Bank of Canada work in conjunction to pick economic winners and losers, if you save money in Canada you’re now a loser, being that Canada has a fractional reserve monetary system, our government is able to spend money it doesn’t have, money that Canadian taxpayers will have to service and eventually pay for later.
Now all of these laws hurt production, so if you’re in the camp that believes automation is taking jobs away, I argue that entitlements and welfare are taking jobs away because Canada actually has a surplus of jobs that can’t be fulfilled, primarily because the government has regulated employees out of existence. Prior to many of the government regulations, companies would groom entry-level employees to take over their business, this doesn’t happen much anymore because one mistake and a business owner could be sued and even jailed. In regards to selling insurance, selling insurance is extremely regulated and it really is nothing more than a glorified sales job in which the government raised the barrier to entry. Now, I want to make sure that people reading this know that I have nothing against salespeople, but real estate, financial planning, insurance salesmen, car salesmen, politicians, these are glorified salespeople.
Now, in case you haven’t been paying attention, I wrote the 2 paragraphs above to illustrate lost issues of debate, because of the modern-day left, Canadians no longer speak of these topics, there are instances in which the government is better suited to handle particular societal issues, but there are also a whole lot more instances where the government should have left things to the private sector to figure out.
Clean energy has already been solved, it’s not like there’s only one form of nuclear energy, however, because the Leftist of merged with the Globalists and created this climate change globalism tax scheme, there’s an assumption that a carbon tax will fix a problem that Canadians have long known the answer too. The Left, the modern-day Liberal has taken an extremist approach, their my way or the highway approach, the modern Liberal wants to replace the Church with the State and if you read all three of the articles I point too in this post you’ll notice that the writers who are part of Canada’s MAINSTREAM media spend little time detailing both sides of the political argument.
I think it’s disgusting, but as I’ve stated sometimes people just have to learn things the hard way. Maybe Canada simply has to learn things the hard way.
Interesting times ahead