Prince William using Finlands Case Study Wants to Have Zero Homeless: Finland Stagnant Population Growth (Less than 6 Million People), 8.5% of the population are Immigrants, The U.K over 14% are immigrants 67+ million people – June 26, 2023,
So, if you’re a bleeding heart Left Wing Liberal that looks to countries like Finland for your Social-Progressive agenda, you’d be wise to actually understand what’s happening in countries like Finland.
Most of the Left Wingers I meet that are white or of European descent are far more racist than Conservative White/Europeans in practice. Conservative people of Euro descent usually want LAW and Order, and if they’re racists or have racial tendencies, they are more frank and open about it.
The Left Wing people of Euro descent, in practice, are usually BLATANTLY racist but are far better at hiding their racism in politics. If you observe the current LGBT agenda, it seeks to usurp “special privileges and rights, initially granted to black and brown people and hand it over to mostly homosexual white men and women.
This is an example of Left-wingers using the STATE to get special perks and privileges into perpetuity because they imagine themselves to be part of some sort of PROTECTED class.
What I’m getting at here is that Left Wing policies and socialist policies historically have been created to PROTECT certain CULTURES, ethnic or racial groups. If one observes Finland, even their immigrant classes are mostly White. A lot of middle easterners can pass for white, and most of Finland’s NON-WHITE immigrants are from the middle east.
This immigrant problem in Finland is already proving to be a challenge for Left Wing politicians who currently still dominate Finland’s political system. Personally, I don’t see anything wrong with Finland wanting to preserve its culture and heritage; what’s wrong with Africa being mostly black, Asia being mostly East and South Asian, and Europe being mostly white?
Even though North America is still mostly Brown, most people in the Americas have indigenous ancestry, it’s blown out of proportion in countries like Canada and the United States, which have reparations programs for their Aboriginal populations, but most people in the Americas have indigenous blood. Mexico alone has over 126 million people, and only a tiny fraction of those people would be considered to have 100% European blood.
The largest minority group in the United States is Mexicans, if you go to Texas or California, most of the white Mexicans you’ll see, have indigenous blood in their veins. I bring this up because POLITICS or popular politics can often create FALSE narratives.
If you’re going to be a socialist or if you’re going to mirror political redistribution schemes that work in predominantly white European nations, you’d be wise to first look at the DEMOGRAPHICS of your local population.
When I talk to these UNIONIZED white laborers or when I talk to skilled laborers, many are ok with taking care of people who share their race and/or their CULTURE. However, if their government bombards them with immigrants, these same skilled laborers will want to be compensated with a PREMIUM.
Let’s call it for what it is, a lot of immigrants are RUDE and disrespectful to white people. I know a lot of white Conservatives who would love to clean up the black neighborhoods in the United States for FREE but refuse to get involved because most black people are hostile towards them.
A lot of Muslim immigrants living in countries like Sweden and Finland are sometimes hostile to the white population, imagining that everything is RACIST. In the U.K., because the native white population has gotten used to the hostility, it’s now embedded into the culture to let the government handle the complicated issues, and we, as they labour, will focus on how we are PROPPERLY compensated.
Solving homelessness is EXPENSIVE and doesn’t only require volunteers; it requires capital to build and maintain these housing developments. Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden have a State capitalism model in their economies. What I mean by this is that Finland’s welfare state is PAID for via their governments running their government similar to a BUSINESS.
The U.K. is not designed this way, the commonwealth, in general, is currently heavily dependent on the STRENGTH of their currencies, which leads to a lot of economic DEFICIENCIES. Having the world’s reserve currency is a gift and a curse; it’s a gift in that selling your debt is easy; the curse is that politicians will run up the COST of operating a PRIVATE business and make up for the lack of revenue by simply running larger deficits.
So in countries like Canada, the U.K., and Australia, there exists a lot of STRUCTURAL economic problems that do not exist in Finland. The U.S. has a very similar problem, but the U.S., which is a republic, has States rights, which prevents the Federal government from doing the types of economic damage that you’ll experience in some commonwealth countries.
Finland is actually paying for its welfare State, whereas the U.K. isn’t; that’s what I’m getting at here. Even though Prince William plans to use charities to achieve his agenda, most people know charities are often contributing factors to accelerating POVERTY.
I have African friends, many of them HATE charities in Africa, as these charities DESTROY the local economy. Why should I build a business in Africa if some charity is going to give away what I’m selling for FREE?
Now, if you’re a Finland, and you’re paying for the poverty problem with REAL MONEY, the government will likely do a cost-benefit analysis because, unlike the U.K. Pound, the Finns don’t have complete control over the Euro or the European Union.
Meaning that the Finns have to balance the checkbook. Recently when former Prime Minister Liz Truss was faced with the reality that austerity measures would be needed to fix the U.K. economy, she QUIT! I like to point out that without low-interest rates, we’re not even sure if these charities will be properly financed.
Access to easy capital has created all sorts of DISTORTIONS in the economy, which has led to homelessness accelerating because the cost to acquire PROPERTY, which is tied to cheap access to capital, has made RENTING more expensive.
In countries like the U.K., most politicians love to create new REGULATIONS for the economy. Government regulations, even if you like them, make building and maintaining housing more expensive. Notice I didn’t even write about the Demographics in the U.K. that don’t exist in Finland. There is a much larger Black, South Asian, and Muslim population in the U.K. that doesn’t exist in Finland.
A lot of the immigrants to Finland are white Europeans. Not so in the U.K.; furthermore, there’s already a movement in Finland to limit immigration, try doing that in the U.K. and you’d be considered a white supremacist, which also equates to the U.K. having more of a population growth explosion. The U.K. also has less land than Finland.
Will Prince William sell off the family land to house these immigrants? We must also remember that Prince William depends on the PUBLIC for his standard of living. Is Prince William really the person you want to be in charge of this? Although this sounds like a social initiative, it’s actually an economic issue. Well, we’ll have to wait and see how this all unfolds.
Interesting times ahead!