RichInWriters.com

Marketing Information One Blog Post at a Time

Menu
  • International Dating Services
  • Work From Home Coding
Menu

Did The Brother of Jagmeet Singh (Gurratan Singh) Just Advocate For Gun Rights? “fend for themselves.” – June 13, 2025

Posted on June 13, 2025 by RichInWriters

Until you’ve actually received a death threat, it’s easy to dismiss the freedoms and liberties of others. For many Canadians, especially those who take civil liberties seriously, this is exactly why personal protection and the right to self-defense matters. It’s also why I’ve made it a point not to knowingly vote for non-Christian politicians—many simply don’t understand or respect freedom, property rights, or the moral foundation of liberty itself.

Look at what’s happening in the U.K. They’ve already confiscated firearms and are now going after knives. Meanwhile, Canada is following a similar trajectory—restricting gun ownership while importing large populations from countries with values that even Jagmeet Singh himself once treated with hostility, especially when those values didn’t align with his political ambitions.

Now that Jagmeet is no longer leader of the NDP, his brother Gurratan Singh is calling on Canadian taxpayers to foot the bill for his personal security—indefinitely. It’s as if Jagmeet were a former Prime Minister. But here’s the question no one seems to be asking: If Canadian citizens were still allowed to legally protect themselves, would we even be having this conversation?

The Irony of Censorship and Disarmament

Jagmeet Singh has a history of supporting restrictive gun laws and censorship of dissenting voices. Yet now, after years of championing policies that weaken personal freedom and empower bureaucracy, he’s facing the very consequences of a disarmed and overly dependent society.

If Jagmeet had chosen to invest in personal protection—or if the Sikh community were empowered to protect their own—perhaps this entire debate over publicly funded security wouldn’t exist. But instead, the same people who pushed for catch-and-release policies and disarmament are now demanding special treatment.

In America, death threats—while never welcome—are far less disruptive for public figures who can legally defend themselves or surround themselves with an armed community. When law-abiding citizens are empowered, criminals are forced to think twice. But when a country disarms its citizens, criminals—and by extension, political radicals—gain the upper hand.

Disarmed Citizens, Emboldened Criminals

The economics of violence matter. If a criminal—or worse, a foreign actor—wants to target someone in an armed community, that requires planning, risk, and significantly more resources. But if the entire population is disarmed, the cost of attacking a public figure drops significantly.

This is the reality Canada now faces: our cities suffer from low-IQ gang culture, emboldened by policies that protect offenders more than citizens. Jagmeet Singh’s own embrace of “catch and release” reforms has arguably helped empower the very people now threatening his safety.

The “Duty to Warn” Debate

Gurratan Singh’s recent statements are eye-opening. He argues that anyone who receives a “duty to warn” notification—used by police to alert someone of a credible threat—should be provided government-funded protection. He called the current situation, where some people are “left to fend for themselves,” “unacceptable.”

His brother, Jagmeet Singh, reportedly received one such warning in late 2023 and was placed under police protection during the federal election campaign. At the time, his wife was pregnant with their second child, and Singh told reporters he even considered leaving politics.

What’s interesting is that Gurratan Singh, a former Ontario MPP, now appears to be acknowledging the value of self-defense, though indirectly. If it’s unacceptable for Canadians to “fend for themselves,” is he also admitting that most Canadians have no legal means to do otherwise?

Because that’s the real issue. In a country where public servants and high-profile figures can call for security on demand, the rest of us are left with no option but to rely on police—who arrive after the fact.

The Hypocrisy of Special Privileges

The Singh family’s concerns are valid—but they underscore a massive double standard. When politicians are threatened, they expect immediate and perpetual protection—funded by taxpayers. But when everyday Canadians are threatened—especially in gang-ridden urban areas—the response is “wait your turn,” or worse, “don’t defend yourself.”

Balpreet Singh of the World Sikh Organization has also criticized the lack of long-term protection for Jagmeet Singh and others under similar threats. Meanwhile, other Sikh activists say they’ve had to uproot their lives, leave their homes, and avoid public spaces altogether. And yet, none of this has sparked a serious conversation about restoring gun rights.

The Real Takeaway: Freedom Isn’t Free

If we truly believe that life and liberty are worth protecting, then we must also believe that self-defense is a right, not a privilege. Canada can’t have it both ways. We can’t strip citizens of their right to defend themselves and then act shocked when they’re left vulnerable.

So yes, Gurratan Singh may not have meant to advocate for gun rights—but his statement that it’s unacceptable for people to “fend for themselves” reveals the fundamental flaw in Canada’s current policies.

You can’t keep disarming the population while asking them to trust a system that plays favourites and leaves the rest behind.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

  • Price Controls and Waste Management: Why Canadian Leftists Undermine First Nations Communities – July 19, 2025
  • Divisive Socialists & Censorship: Canadian MPs call for special protective agency after threats spiked in Justin Trudeau era – July 18, 2025
  • Why Landlords and Subleasers Don’t Register Tenants in Russia: Reviewing: “Black woman who left US for Russia to escape ‘discrimination’ is beaten by racist neighbors” – July 18, 2025
  • Jordan Peterson Leaves Canada: CRTC and the Online Harms Act, Bill C-63 – July 17, 2025
  • Mark Carney’s Import Curbs Don’t Put Canadian Steel First — They Put ESG First (Carbon-Free Steel) – July 16, 2025
  • Tomboys and Transgender Athletes: Women’s Sports in a Shifting Cultural Landscape – July 16, 2025
  • Plastic Pollution: A Crisis Fueled by Censorship, Price Controls, and Government Overregulation – July 16, 2025

Categories

  • International Dating Service
  • Becoming a Consultant
  • Corporate Financing
  • Work From Home Coding
  • Affiliates
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Contact
©2023 RichInWriters.com | Powered by Liberty