Wax My Scrotum, Transgender Supremacist wants to FORCE Canadian salons to Wax ‘her’ balls – January 12, 2020,
Civil rights, social justice, the initiation of the use of force by the Government to make citizens perform labor-related tasks to people they’d prefer not to serve. If a person goes to a bar, the bartender can refuse to serve you, it’s happened to me before, because apparently I looked like a person that caused discomfort to staff members at a bar. Of course, the staff had been mistaken because it was the first time I had attended that bar, but I looked like the perpetrated and therefore I was told I wouldn’t be served and it was best that my friends and I leave.
Oddly enough when I actually saw the picture of the actual perpetrator, the individual did kind of look like me. An odd story I know, but that’s the only way I could personally relate to the story because the individual who did damage that bar, made the news, so when the cops showed up to arrest me, turns out that the staff were in their rights not serve me a there was a warrant out for this persons arrest.
That aside, the lesson I learned that day, which was now more than 2 decades ago, was that private businesses can refuse to serve you. I had heard about the “no colors allowed” signs in the American south businesses during the Jim Crow era, in my younger years I had misinterpreted what Jim Crow was and therefore I had similar view to the world as Jessica Yaniv that people with businesses had to serve everyone that showed up and a business owner couldn’t be prejudice for any reason otherwise I as a customer could sue them. There are still many people that hold this world view that slavery should exist in some capacity.
Jessica Yaniv, Transgender Supremacy and why others should be forced to serve ‘her’ because of an act of Nature
I’m a minority and my people have suffered in the past so that I can have special privileges under the law now. Collectivism is an attempt to usurp political power by using what is imagined to be moral principles, by individuals not willing to do the physical labour necessary to build and maintain a society. If you’ll observe most of the leaders of collectivism aren’t willing to do the hard work, they want others to be forced to do at a price the collectivists feel is fair and just.
I’m not sure Jessica Yaniv has ever waxed anyone else’s balls? nor am I sure that she would be willing to do it. Identify as what you want, Jessica Yaniv has a scrotum, there’s o getting around that, now personally if I owned a business that does these types of spa related things, I wouldn’t label anything male or female I label everything based on genitalia. As an example, a “number 1” on the menu is a virginal wax often referred to as a “Brazilian wax”, this item on the menu is ideal for individuals with vagina, now until the transgenders can change the legal term for the word vagina, that’s how I’d word my menu.
Am I succumbing to political pressure, by appeasing a very tiny minority, who collectively in most instances know that waxing a scrotum isn’t easy? Of course, I am. However, I’m in business and therefore I’d personally try to stay ahead of the curb, however, if my services were labelled correctly I don’t even know how Jessica Yaniv cold target me? I could be looking at this all wrong, but as a business owner myself I often find that your explanations or your terms of service policies often deter scammers. What I mean is when a sign is clearly marked that “This business will not be held responsible in the event you’re not satisfied with our service” I find that certain customers won’t come around.
Jessica Yaniv based on the article below appeared to be targeting particular salons intentionally, purely for political and financial gain and now she’s managed to get the attention she desired. However, it appears at this point she was rather short-sighted in her approach as it clearly appears that she like I did when I was younger, misinterpreted the law and therefore has no put the courts on notice that she’s a trouble maker. I’m not entirely sure if in time she’ll be rewarded for crying wolf repeatedly, however, now she’s set a precedent that Transgenders can’t use their minority status to force a small business to do as they command.
It’s important to understand the ramifications of the regulation that she was attempting to create. If over waxing services you must wax all people and potential entities that identify as female, Jordan Peterson all of sudden doesn’t sound so Conservative when you observe the basis of Jessica Yaniv’s court argument up close. Jordan Peterson who many respects is a Classical Liberal has been shoved into the category of being a Conservative because of his stance on Freedom of speech, freedom of expression and the law being interpreted equally amongst everyone.
What the new age Liberals, which in many ways are socialist, communists are trying to achieve is specially crafted protected statuses for particular minority groups. With these special statuses, particular minority groups will have special rights under the law, these subjective special rights under the law would, in fact, allow a Jessica Yaniv to use her minority status to effectively force individuals and businesses to cater to Jessica Yaniv’s needs in order to remain in business under the law.
Special privileges for minority groups already exist, which shouldn’t, and in my opinion, this is why she assumes that there should be a loophole somewhere in the law that will force other Canadian citizens to do as she commands. I’m almost positive that in some other capacity, she’s been able to game the system, using her minority status, the fact that I’m even referring to Jessica as ‘her’ gives you an indication of the role politics plays in human interactions in Canada.
Now, the real problem with Jessica Yaniv was her short-sighted approach, you see she targeted small businesses, small business is actually responsible for a large chunk of tax collection, the reason why the Bernie Sanders types focus on “taxing the rich” by claiming that the rich need to pay their fair share is that small business are the majority, the uber-rich are the minority and like it or not, most small businesses are a bad economic quarter away from going bankrupt.
Meaning if you raise the cost to do business on small businesses, they might simply back up their stuff and leave and if the wrong legal precedent is set, particularly small businesses won’t even exist in particular portions of the Canadian economy anymore. Most manufactured goods sold in Canada weren’t made in China, government regulations created this made in china disaster. Want a weak Canadian dollar, a bloated expensive to manage government, wage and price controls? Well, Canada got it, but the price to pay for it was we became unfavorable to particular businesses.
When the government passes a law, it doesn’t mean that businesses or people and businesses affected are simply going to stick around and allow themselves to be taken advantage of, free human beings can leave and when they leave, commercial real estate becomes vacant, sure a commercial space can be replaced, but for how long? Most businesses in a free market atmosphere go bankrupt within 10 years, in a heavily government-regulated atmosphere, businesses tend to go bankrupt much faster, Target only lasted a few months in Canada and notice that nothing has replaced it?
The main reason why manufacturing has left Canada is because of regulations, taxes and minimum wages, now if you go to most nations which are raising their standard of living every year, their business landscape is dominated by local manufacturing and small businesses. When your country manufactures, your small business community often does a lot of donations, this was of course why Canada became the envy of the world. However, because of Leftist dogma which is attempting to hollow out Canada’s manufacturing sectors, the Canadian economy has become stagnant in the worst type of way.
Japan has a stagnant economy, however, Japan still manufacturers a ton of FINISHED goods for the world, Canada’s manufacturing sector is dwindling and we’re’ becoming more reliant on our mineral wealth which is also under attack by the Leftists. Now, what Jessica Yaniv is doing is she is attacking the service sector portion of the economy, which even the leftist knows is very important to tax collection.
If Canada is going to stop producing things and create carbon taxes to stop oil and gas and other portions of the economy from being productive, if the Liberal government has its way and uses their pollution taxes as their means tax particular industries out of existence, what’s left is a service sector economy, an industry Jessica Yaniv is attempting to use the legal system to overly regulate. It’s funny how things happen, anyway, this topic is making me want to vomit, I hope Canadians can wake up to what’s happening to our great nation soon because the Leftists are trying to destroy us
Interesting times ahead!